Official scorer's call ignites controversy
Ryan Raburn blames himself. And rightfully so. He was the one who butchered the routine fly ball to left field on Saturday that let three Indians cross the plate and led to a five-run Cleveland rally.
Zach Miner doesnt believe he deserved to have those five earned runs on his tab. And hes right. It wasnt fair. The fact that Miner will be eligible for salary arbitration at the end of the season could make those five runs quite costly.
Initially, the official scorer, Ron Kleinfelter, awarded Clevelands Asdrubal Cabrera a double on the fly ball that Raburn first misjudged, then dropped as he raced toward the left field fence. It was not a snap call. Kleinfelter is a competent, conscientious scorer. He wrestled with his decision long after Saturdays 9-7 Tiger win was over.
As a result of Kleinfelters decision, Miners earned run average temporarily leaped from 4.50 to 6.75. So were not talking about some trivial matter here.
On Sunday, under continuing pressure from the Tigers public relations department, Kleinfelter reversed Saturdays call, charging Raburn with an error and erasing those five earned runs from Miners permanent record.
The changed call also cost Asdrubal Cabrera a base hit and three RBI, which, understandably, did not make the Indians happy.
I thought, under the scoring rules, Kleinfelter made the correct call on Saturday. And I told him so at the time. But there also was no doubt in my mind that Raburn botched the play.
The only thing I disagree with was the way Kleinfelter was pressured by the Tigers PR staff during and after Saturdays game and again on Sunday until he reluctantly agreed to change the call.
Kleinfelter, like all official scorers, is paid by major league baseball and should be treated accordingly. The Tigers PR people wouldnt dare browbeat an umpire like that if they disagreed with one of his decisions.
Although Jim Leyland didnt complain to the scorer personally _ he almost never does _ there was no question in his mind about how that pivotal play should have been called.
From the start of that play to the end of that play it was an error all the way, the Tigers manager declared Sunday. Raburn should have caught that ball. In fairness to Zach Miner, it should have been called an error, I dont care if it was Ryan Raburn out there, Jim Leyland, or whoever. Zach Miner did not deserve five earned runs that inning
But I respect the official scorers, Leyland continued. I think its a very difficult job. Hes doing his job like Im doing me. That stuff has been going on for years. Its never going to stop. Theres a lot at stake. But in a situation like that, you dont call up to the press box, yelling and screaming, badgering somebody. You just dont do that.
As fate would have it, Miners locker, and that of Raburn, are side by side in the Tigers clubhouse.
It might have made for a awkward situation. But it didnt.
Zach Miner is not mad at Ryan Raburn, Leyland said Sunday. Hes upset because he got a bunch of earned runs tacked on that shouldnt have been tacked on.
Its a Catch-22 for a player because youre talking about a team. One thing I will not tolerate here is somebody pointing fingers.
On Sunday, sensing that Raburn was still down in the dumps, Leyland called the young outfielder into his office.
Relax, the manager urged. This game is supposed to be fun. Besides, its Sunday so I cant go out and buy a gun.
To which Raburn softly replied, Ive got a gun out in my truck if you want to borrow it.
Then Raburn smiled.
Mission accomplished.
3 Comments:
"I thought, under the scoring rules, Kleinfelter made the correct call on Saturday. And I told him so at the time."
Really? As a scorer of NCAA baseball, I feel that this play was botched by the official scorer (initially) almost as badly as a call can be botched. The only plays that pale in comparison are the two drops Raburn had in Anaheim that were ruled as hits.
I'm not an fancy score keeper for baseball or even some other sport but I do know an error when I see one.
Raburn was the one who DROPPED the ball after it was initially a catch. Is that not an error anymore or has the definition of an error been changed?
Plays like that in the infield would be called a error (as should any initially caught balls when it is clear that the pitcher is not the one doing the catching) so I was sure that they were going to call it an error.
That didn't happen and the official scorekeeper of the game should be ashamed of himself for not calling that an error. However, he fixed his mistake when he changed the call.
Detroit had EVERY right to hound him about that call. Like I said, plays in the infield that cost nothing to the other team have been called errors and I think the fact that 3 RUNS were able to score should be hounded on for.
Does baseball still do replays during baseball games?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home